Start with the right foundation.
- Python developers building AI applications
- Data and ML engineers
- Solution architects evaluating agent workflows
- Technical product teams prototyping controlled automation
Build controlled AI agents with tools, retrieval, state, durable workflows, human approval, evaluation, observability and safety boundaries.
Learn when an agent is appropriate, when a deterministic workflow is safer and how to make either observable. The program focuses on production reasoning: tool contracts, state, checkpoints, retrieval quality, human control, evaluation and failure recovery.
The goal is not to memorize product menus. Each outcome connects architecture, implementation and operational evidence.
Choose between deterministic workflows, agents and hybrid graphs
Design safe tool interfaces and explicit state transitions
Build retrieval and memory with clear evaluation criteria
Add checkpoints, human approval, traces and recovery to long-running work
Every module includes a practical deliverable so you can explain what you built, why you chose it and how you verified it.
Define the job, risk and success criteria before selecting an agent architecture.
Classify six automation cases and defend where deterministic code, a workflow or an agent should be used.
Create narrow tool contracts that validate inputs, handle errors and expose only necessary authority.
Build read and write tools for a support workflow with validation, confirmation and safe retry behavior.
Treat retrieval as an evaluated system rather than attaching a vector database and hoping.
Create a small policy assistant and measure retrieval failures with a labeled question set.
Model nodes, state and conditional edges so execution remains inspectable.
Implement a triage graph with deterministic routing, specialist nodes and an explicit stop condition.
Use checkpoints and interrupts to pause risky actions and resume after failures.
Add approval before an external write, simulate interruption and prove the workflow resumes correctly.
Measure task success, tool behavior, latency, cost and safety before release.
Create a release gate with success, citation, tool-error and human-escalation measures.
A useful portfolio shows decisions and evidence, not screenshots alone.
Triage requests, retrieve policy evidence and require approval before account changes.
Evidence to retainCoordinate search, evidence extraction and cited synthesis with explicit quality checks.
Evidence to retainAssess an agent prototype for authority, privacy, reliability and operations risk.
Evidence to retainTechnology changes. These primary references help you verify current features and continue learning after the course. ITCertPath is an independent training brand and is not endorsed by the listed vendors.
Ask for a written syllabus, delivery plan, trainer profile, lab arrangement, fee breakdown and cancellation terms.
No. LangChain agents can be suitable for straightforward tool-calling applications, while LangGraph is useful when you need explicit state, branching, persistence, interrupts or low-level orchestration control.
It introduces subgraphs and specialist delegation, but only after tool, state and evaluation foundations. Multiple agents add coordination and observability costs, so the course does not treat them as the default architecture.
The concepts are designed to be model-provider aware but not locked to one model. Confirm supported providers, API costs and the current lab setup before enrolling. API usage may incur separate provider charges.
Tell us your experience, target role, time zone and preferred learning format. We will share the current options without promising a batch that has not been confirmed.